The One Deduction Most S Corporations Get Wrong


It’s not that hard to figure out what the IRS is going to do next. For one thing, they tell us tax pros every year where they are going to focus their attention. But, if you’re paying attention you can figure it out a year or more in advance and that gives you time to prepare.

One of the areas that we’ll see a lot more audits in is S Corporations. And one of the problems areas is going to be medical insurance deductibility.

It’s confusing, and doesn’t make a lot of sense, but here’s how medical insurance deductions work for an S Corporation according to IRS issued Notice 2008-1. (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-08-01.pdf)

In short, medical insurance paid under individual medical insurance plans may be deductible “above the line” if the following conditions are met:

  1. The corporation must establish a “plan” for the payment of medical insurance premiums on behalf of the shareholder-employee.
  2. The corporation must either pay the premiums for the plan, or reimburse the employee-shareholder for the premiums paid after being provided proof of premium payment to the S corp.
  3. Premiums so paid or reimbursed on behalf of the shareholder-employee MUST BE ADDED TO W-2 BOX 1 WAGES. These premiums should be EXCLUDED from Box 3 Social Security Wages and Box 5 Medicare Wages (thus they are exempt from FICA taxes completely).
  4. On the 1120S for the S corporation, the corporate tax return will include a deduction for wages/compensation paid which includes the medical insurance paid on behalf of the shareholder employee.
  5. On the shareholder-employee’s 1040 an above the line deduction will be taken for the medical insurance paid by the corporation which were added to the W-2. In Notice 2008-1 the IRS states that if this treatment is not followed, the medical insurance deduction “above the line” will be disallowed and the deduction will be moved to Schedule A. If this happens, the value of the deduction is generally severely limited due to the 7.5% threshold that must be exceeded before medical expenses are allowed.

ACTION ITEMS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS DEDUCTION:

  1. Document the existence of your corporation’s “plan” by making note of it in your annual minutes.
  2. If you have paid the medical insurance individually, gather up all of your medical insurance payments for 2009 and submit a reimbursement to your corporation to reimburse yourself for those amounts. Post the reimbursement check to “Officer Wages” or similar gross pay expense account.
  3. Contact your payroll company to provide them with the information necessary to include the medical insurance expense (directly paid by the corporation or reimbursed to the shareholder) in your final paycheck and your W-2 for 2009.

If you’ve already issued the W-2s (which you should have) you can create amended ones to correct the medical insurance issue.

If you’ve got an S Corporation, the IRS has its eye on you. And that means an audit. If the audits are anything like the brutal audit teams that have targeted Real Estate Professionals then we can expect some bad times ahead for S Corporations.

Be prepared! Our March 23rd USTaxAid coaching session http://www.usataxaid.com/coaching is focusing on Filing Your S Corporation tax return – safely and with the most legal tax deductions you can take.


Tags:

Related posts:


33 Comments so far:


On February 28th, 2010 | 7:42 pm
Diane Kennedy said:

The IRS is pretty clear that a greater than 2% shareholder does not have the same benefits available that a regular employee does.

My concern as I read your details is it looks like you’re mixing the two a bit. The benefits will be exempt from Social Security & Medicare, but are not deductible for income tax purposes, but the time you’ve done the proper reporting on your W-2.

But I might be incorrectly reading what you’re doing. My suggestion is to contact your plan administrator and lay out exactly what you are doing. If they say it’s okay, then their name, reputation and E & O insurance is on the line. You should also check in with your CPA to make sure your W-2 is being properly prepared.


On March 1st, 2010 | 1:17 pm
Liz said:

Hi, Diane.

I have done some calculations and cannot figure out what the benefit is to the IRS in having >2% shareholders report health insurance this way. If it’s on the W2 as Box 1 wages but not in Boxes 3 & 5 and an above-the-line deduction for AGI on the 1040, doesn’t it have the same net tax effect as being deducted on the S corp’s P&L?

The only thing I can think of is when, years ago, less than 100% of self-employed health insurance was deductible to an individual, and so it would be a tax benefit for the corporation to deduct 100% on the P&L instead of the 60/70/80/90% allowed by the individual each year until it became 100%.

Just wondering your thoughts.

Thanks!


On March 1st, 2010 | 2:10 pm
Diane Kennedy said:

Liz, your comment is logical. Unfortunately, tax law doesn’t always follow logic.

My guess (and it’s only a guess) is that we’ve gotten here through a series of rule changes. There was a time a few years ago when we all had our hearts stop for a moment when the IRS said that med insurance had to be in the name of the corp in order to be deductible. That left hundreds of thousands of solopreneurs out in the cold. In fact, the IRS said we had to report the benefit if it was paid by the S Corp on the W-2.

So in effect it became a taxable benefit to the owner, ie no tax benefit.

Then, after a lot of complaints, the deduction came back. But instead of taking it as an S Corp deduction, they’ve done it this circuitous way.

I think they’re tracking how many people actually take the deduction for purposes of stats.


On December 3rd, 2010 | 6:42 pm
Alexis said:

Diane,

Thanks for an informative article. I am setting this reimbursement up in Quickbooks Payroll and I am wondering if you can tell me which items I should select for tax purposes. I know you said it is not subject to Medicare or SS, but what about the others? These are my choices for tax deductions on this reimbursement:

Federal Unemployment
Federal Withholding
Medicare Company
Medicare Employee
SS Company
SS Employee
CA Witholding

I can’t seem to find this information anywhere! Thank you ahead of time.

Alexis


On December 5th, 2010 | 10:49 am
Diane Kennedy said:

Alexis,

In the case of a distribution, it’s not payroll. So you would pay it out of QuickBooks just like it was a payment to vendor. The account to “charge” for the “expense” is shareholder distribution.

For example, let’s say you have an S Corp with two shareholders - you and Sam. Set up a Shareholder Distribution - Alexis and a Shareholder Distribution - Sam account, each one tagged as an equity account.


On December 5th, 2010 | 11:32 pm
Alexis said:

Diane,

It’s my understanding that because this needs to show up on the W-2, it isn’t a distribution but rather more like a reimbursement so I was trying to figure out which taxes applied to it. I think Medicare and SS should be left out but wasn’t sure about the others. Then, I get my taxes back on my personal return as an above the line deduction and the company gets to write it off as an expense, correct?

http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=203100,00.html

Do distributions need to show up on a W-2?

Alexis


On December 6th, 2010 | 8:48 am
Diane Kennedy said:

Sorry, Alexis, I was (and still am) a bit confused.

You have an employee that you are reimbursing for an expense? So, it’s not related to an S Corporation owner and distribution? What is the expense? Does the employee have any ownership? If so, what percentage?


On December 6th, 2010 | 9:15 am
Alexis said:

I was referring to the medical deduction. I guess I didn’t mention that because it is the topic of this thread.


On December 6th, 2010 | 9:19 am
Alexis said:

Also I am the employee and I have 100% ownership. My guess at this point is that I need to take out Federal and State Witholding in Quickbooks but none of the medicare, SS, or federal unemployment.


On December 6th, 2010 | 9:21 am
Alexis said:

Oh, and it is an S-corp and I am paying the health insurance with my personal money! Sorry I didn’t mention these details.


On January 3rd, 2011 | 2:31 am
Edward said:

Should a >2% S-corporation shareholder exclude HRA payments and company paid health insurance premiums from both State Unemployment Taxes and County Personal Proprery Taxes?


On January 3rd, 2011 | 2:47 pm
Diane Kennedy said:

Edward, the HRA payments do need to get reported on the Form W-2. They aren’t subject to Social Security taxes and income taxes for sure. I’m fairly certain they aren’t subject to State Unemployment taxes, but just to be certain - what state are you in?

As far as personal property taxes, these are generally calculated based on personal property assets, which payroll and HRA wouldn’t impact.


On January 3rd, 2011 | 5:47 pm
Edward said:

I live in Virginia, and the instructions for Virginia unemployment quarterly form VEC-FC-20 (Employer’s Quarterly Tax Report) Line B1 indicates that the Total Wages (before deductions) must equal total on payroll. Instructions also indicate “Wages include cash bonuses, tips, commission, severance pay, etc., and remuneration other than cash paid to individual employees”.

Does the Total Wages (for state unemployment) have to match a certain Total Amount shown on IRS Form 941 (Employer’s Total Federal Tax Return)? If so, IRS Form 941 Line 2 (Wages, Tips, ad other compensation) includes HRA payments and health insurance premiums, but IRS Form 941, Lines 5a (Taxable Social Security Wages) and 5c (Taxable Medicare Wages & Tips) do not include HRA payments or health insurance premiums.


On January 12th, 2011 | 2:19 pm
Kathryn said:

Diane,
In the 1/3/2011 post on HRA reimbursements being reported on W-2, you write that they are NOT subject to Soc Sec and Income Taxes. Did you mean SS and Medicare? I thought the out-of-pocket medical reimbursements ARE subject to income taxes (but not payroll).
Please clarify!! Thanks!


On January 16th, 2011 | 9:54 pm
Diane Kennedy said:

Kathryn,

That should have said that they are not subject to Soc Sec and Medicare. Sorry for the mistake and thanks for catching it.


On February 3rd, 2011 | 8:39 pm
Japheth Campbell said:

Diane,

Should premiums paid or reimbursed on behalf of the shareholder-employee be included somewhere on the quarterly Form 941, or just on the W-2? Thanks!

Japheth


On February 5th, 2011 | 2:56 am
Diane Kennedy said:

Japheth says: Should premiums paid or reimbursed on behalf of the shareholder-employee be included somewhere on the quarterly Form 941, or just on the W-2? Thanks!

Oh, good question! I went back and looked at the Form 941. I can’t see where you would include it and I didn’t this past year. (Which worried me, because I thought maybe I should have) As near as I can tell, it’s just reported on the Form W-2. Love to hear if anyone has reported it on the quarterly Form 941.


On February 5th, 2011 | 3:14 pm
Kathryn said:

I did include on the 941 line 2 Wages, tips, and
other compensation (as other compensation). I
was uncomfortable with the totals not matching up with the quarterly 941’s and the W-2 (and W-3).

I don’t know if this was correct.


On April 11th, 2011 | 2:44 am
David said:

I just learned about the rules for S corp shareholder medical insurance. My costs have been incorrectly excluded from box 1 of my w2 for the past few years and much of the costs were reported in box 12 as a cafeteria expense for health insurance. We also have a high deductibility health insurance plan and my contribution to a health savings account was also excluded from box 1 and reported in box 12. I plan to have my accountant reissue my w2 for 2010 so that I can properly report these deductions. I guess that my accountant should also file an ammended return for the S corp for 2010. Should I do the same for 2009 and amend my personal return? What about 2008?

My parents and siblings work for a seperate S corp so I compared notes on this subject with them. It looks like they almost got it right. Shareholder medical expense was included in box 1, box 3 it did not matter since they are all over the limit, but it was also included in box 5, resulting in excess medicair taxes. Between my parents and siblings and including both the employee and employer portions this could amount to about 3,000 per year. Is it worth refiling for them or does this increase the chance for an audit? Also, my parents and one of my siblings had the accounting firm for the company also file their personal return, and they correctly took the deduction for medical insurance above the line, but two other siblings have been using turbo tax and missed this deduction. Should they amend their returns or again would this potentially invite an audit?

Thanks


On April 11th, 2011 | 2:44 pm
David said:

Corrections to my last post:
1) it was box 14, not box 12 that we reported HSA contributions and cafeteria contribution to my health insurance for 2010. It turns out that those amounts were included in officers salaries on the company tax return but I do need them added to box 1 on my W2.
2) 2008 should be OK because we had pay and health benefits from a C corporation that year.
3) My parent’s and siblings S corp (different from my own) has elected not to go after a refund on the medicare tax, as it is not worth the expense to have their outside accounting firm file it, but there is still the question if they should refile personal returns from previous years that did not deduct the medical insurance.

Thanks again.


On April 11th, 2011 | 4:39 pm
Diane Kennedy said:

David, I never like to advise whether to prepare an amendment or not. If the return is wrong, then technically it needs to be collected. But their preparer is in the best position as to what the risk of not correcting it (penalties and interest) would be versus correcting it.


On April 12th, 2011 | 7:58 pm
James Sack said:

Hello Diane,
First of all, thank you for sharing your expertise. I’ve already learned quite a bit reading your website.

I am the only full-time employee of the S-corp that I set up. My wife is a part-time employee, and there are no other employees. She purchases medical insurance pre-tax through her employer for our family of four. I have asked a benefits company here in Colorado if it is legit to set up an HRA in her name, since I am a greater than 2% shareholder. The benefits company here is saying that it will surely be disallowed, and here is his reasoning:

“For years, these HRA’s were marketed as spousal or family reimbursement arrangements for sole proprietors; the IRS took a very dim view of most of these planning schemes and disavowed them, and I have not seriously considered them an
effective or even legal means of sheltering health expenses.

The “creation” of HRAs as a legitimate tool for employers to reduce health insurance costs, in conjunction with HSAs, is intended for regular corporations, many of whom are already “self-insured” or operating under a aggregate stop loss medical plan. This would not include the corporate structure you operate under, the S Corporation, which tend to look more like sole props, allowing income to flow through the entity to the owners unimpeded, just like a sole prop.
>
In an S Corporation,majority shareholders are enjoined from participating in HRAs, to the
extent they are classified as “self-employed” and not employees,i.e. +2% shareholder, by statute (not an employee). Your question concerning a part-time employee who is your wife would at first be considered a gray area, until one considers that HRAs work under the same rules that apply to Flexible Spending Accounts - only “common law” employees can participate in such welfare benefit plans. Your wife, because of the nature of the S Corp, is subject to attribution rules for shareholders under Section 318 of the Code (constructive ownership of stock); she is not considered to be a common law employee.

Without getting into the complexities of this tax section, suffice it to say that, as a family member, your wife is, for purposes of taxation with an S Corp, is treated the same as you are, and is thereby prohibited from participation in either an HRA or the aforementioned FSA. So, your answer is no, she
cannot participate in an HRA that you would set up, but not for reasons that have anything to do with her other, full-time employment.”

My question is, do you have the same opinion that S-Corps are unable to utilize this? I have not read this anywhere else. Also, I have not read anything about “common law”. What is your take? Thank you,


On April 15th, 2011 | 3:04 pm
Diane Kennedy said:

Hi James:

Unfortunately, I agree with the benefits company on this one. The rules regarding S Corporations and the >2% owner are pretty clear. The HRA (or MERP) is not allowed.

Likewise, constructive ownership definitions change throughout the Code. In this case, you’re subject to Sec 318, which is really clear that your wife is included as one of the disallowed owners of the S Corp.

If applicable, you may consider hiring your wife as an Independent Contractor so that she has her own Schedule C or even C Corporation. CAUTION: Make sure you have a business purpose for making the change and that she truly is independent, not just a disguised worker.


On April 15th, 2011 | 6:09 pm
James said:

Diane,
Thank you so much for your input. I spoke to Zane Benefits today, and they said the same thing as you, so I am going with that. I did much research on this subject, contacting a number of Benefits companies, and you would be shocked how many told me, “No problem-we can set you up today with an HRA”, even after I had relayed to them my fears about Section 318. Thank you again!
James


On November 15th, 2011 | 2:44 pm
wind said:

I have seen what appears to be about a 50/50 interpretation on HRA reimbursement of medical expenses. I understand that it has to hit the “income” line but what is 50/50 is whether payroll taxes are necessary.

Here’s the example, I, like James, own an S-Corp. I realize that I cannot just receive a health reimbursement benefit without declaring it on the W2 line 1, but do I have to apply other Payroll Taxes to this figure?


On November 16th, 2011 | 1:12 pm
Diane Kennedy said:

Thanks for the question wind.

If you’re a >2% S Corp owner, then the medical insurance adds on as wages, like we discussed above. (And even though like James above said, most benefit companies don’t understand the rules and often give bad advice) The IRS is also taking the position that the medical insurance is just like wages… which means the amount is also subject to payroll taxes. They won a couple of court cases that seem to indicate their position is right. You can read more here: http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=203100,00.html


On November 16th, 2011 | 1:29 pm
wind said:

Thank you for answering, but I’m still a bit confused (by payroll taxes I meant “other” like FICA and FUTA perhaps I used that wrong)…

From the document you referenced:
“These benefits are not subject to Social Security or Medicare (FICA) or Unemployment (FUTA) taxes. The additional compensation is included in Box 1 (Wages) of the Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, issued to the shareholder-employee, but would not be included in Boxes 3 and 5 of Form W-2.”

I worked about a month earning for my company but have since gone W2 to a different company. My company has the money to cover some medical bills our family have, so I thought we could distribute the meager amount as a health reimbursement for documented medical expenses (I’ve read that companies can do this for shareholders). Is it correct that I would not have to calculate FICA and FUCA for such a compensation? I’m so fed up with trying to make sense of this stuff that I almost just want to cut a salary check and call it done, and probably get ripped off because I’m not smart enough to understand this nonsense. You are probably the most clearly educated (including our own accountant) I’ve found. So tell me that I am obligated to pay FICA and FUTA on this and I’ll believe it.


On November 16th, 2011 | 1:53 pm
wind said:

“Heath and accident insurance premiums paid on behalf of the greater than two percent S corporation shareholder-employee are deductible and reportable by the S corporation as wages for income tax withholding purposes on the shareholder-employee’s Form W-2.” … Assuming that this also applies to reimbursements also then the reimbursements would NOT be non-wage for > 2% shareholders and not be limited by this: “S corporations must pay reasonable compensation to a shareholder-employee in return for services that the employee provides to the corporation before non-wage distributions” … So I still expect that we can accept our “wages” as reimbursements instead of salary and not pay the FICA and FUTA so long as the expenses are documented?


On November 16th, 2011 | 1:57 pm
Diane Kennedy said:

wind, I feel your pain:

“The instructions to the Form 1120S, U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation, state “Distributions and other payments by an S corporation to a corporate officer must be treated as wages to the extent the amounts are reasonable compensation for services rendered to the corporation.”

Several court cases support the authority of the IRS to reclassify other forms of payments to a shareholder-employee as a wage expense and subject to employment taxes.”

The part that you quoted above applies to non-shareholder employees.


On November 16th, 2011 | 2:12 pm
wind said:

i’m sorry to bug you but are you sure? Both of those quotes are from consecutive paragraphs (complete with TYPO Heath is a good candy bar) …

“Heath and accident insurance premiums paid on behalf of the greater than two percent S corporation shareholder-employee are deductible and reportable by the S corporation as wages for income tax withholding purposes on the shareholder-employee’s Form W-2.

These benefits are not subject to Social Security or Medicare (FICA) or Unemployment (FUTA) taxes. The additional compensation is included in Box 1 (Wages) of the Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, issued to the shareholder-employee, but would not be included in Boxes 3 and 5 of Form W-2.”

From what I can tell these ARE wages … not non-wage … for “greater than two percent S corporation shareholder-employee” all while “not subject to FICA…” … So are you saying I DO have to pay FICA and FUTA?

Also, remember, I am assuming that “premiums” and “reimbursments” are handled the same way… which also could be wrong.


On December 14th, 2011 | 12:00 pm
Sam said:

RE:2% S-corp health insurance, if company has loss and shareholder has not taken any salary do we still prepare W-2 and include HI on return in Box 1 & 14, or do we have to give them salary in addition to HI


On December 27th, 2011 | 10:36 am
Sarah said:

I have an S-corp shareholder and Board of Director who is NOT an employee. The s-corp pays her medical premiums.

Is this a distribution?? Is this reportable compensation??


On January 19th, 2012 | 12:15 pm
Chrisa said:

Same question as Sam and Sarah.. especially because if there are no other wages subject to FICA than the medical deduction would be disallowed on Form 1040 and revert to Sch A. Therefore, if there is no other salary there is no benefit of S/E Medical. (not sure if any income in S-Corp alone in Sarah’s case would allow deduction or not.)



Leave a Reply

Will not be published


+ 1 = 5